These two measures resulted in millions of deaths.
Compare-contrast essays require students to analyze texts and draw conclusions based on similarities and differences between elements within the texts. This type of analysis is challenging, because it requires multiple levels of thinking.
However, by comparing literary works, students will uncover universal themes in surprising places.
Choose Your Books and Develop Your Purpose For a compare and contrast essay, you will need to find elements within the books that have some type of similarity, such as the characters or themes. The ideas you uncover will help you form your thesis.
Does man have inherent good and evil tendencies? Do we misbehave because of conflicting societal messages? How much are we influenced by external forces? Does each author seem to lean one way or another?
Use Graphic Organizers Once you have chosen your books and your elements for analysis, you will need to closely study the texts, particularly the elements you will be comparing.
Use graphic organizers to organize your thoughts, listing things the elements have in common and things that are different.
A Venn diagram works well for this as it offers a quick visual display of similarities and differences. As you begin to separate the similarities and differences in the work, you will begin to see patterns forming on which you can draw conclusions.
For instance, Dorian Gray and Victor Frankenstein both have secrets. What is similar about their secrecy? What are they hiding and why?
The answers to these questions will help support your thesis. Point by Point A compare-contrast essay can be organized in two ways: You can compare subjects point by point or subject by subject. In the point-by-point method, discuss the different points as they are presented by each character.
You could then discuss the transformation of character in both stories. Both Frankenstein and Dorian Gray transform from innocence to culpability. You could discuss the idea of grotesque appearance in both stories.
What does it symbolize in each work? Subject by Subject If you were to structure your essay to compare elements subject by subject, you would list all the relevant details of one subject first.
For instance, in the Frankenstein-Mr. Hyde comparison, make all the points you wish to about Frankenstein and then make all the points you wish to about Mr. If you choose a subject-by-subject approach, include a paragraph that ties the ideas together.
The compare-contrast paper is analytical, and should not simply sound like a list of points.Editorial Note.
It is ten years since Virginia Woolf published her last volume of collected essays, The Common Reader: Second regardbouddhiste.com the time of her death she was already engaged in getting together essays for a further volume, which she proposed to publish in the autumn of or the spring Of Of the silent trilogy, Earth () is Dovzhenko’s most accessible film but, perhaps for these same reasons, most misunderstood.
In a Brussels’ film jury would vote Earth as one of the great films of all time. Earth marks a threshold in Dovzhenko’s career emblematic of a turning point in the Ukrainian cultural and political avant-garde - the end of one period and transition to another.
How to Write a Comparative Essay. In this Article: Article Summary Developing the Essay Content Organizing the Content Writing the Essay Community Q&A Perhaps you have been assigned a comparative essay in class, or need to write a comprehensive comparative report for work.
INTRODUCTION This essay will compare and contrast the characteristics of two of America’s female leaders. In analysing the effectiveness of their leadership, this essay will evaluate the traits, personality, history, experience, and values of each leader.
There’s a similarity between reading essays and eating candy. Once you open the package, you have to eat the whole goddamn thing. It’s addictive. Compare-contrast essays require students to analyze texts and draw conclusions based on similarities and differences between elements within the texts.
This type of analysis is challenging, because it requires multiple levels of thinking.