Tar refusing to write archive contents to terminal

I think it would be nice if someone adds a link to a Windows version of dd. I am looking for a version which has all the options of the Unix dd.

Tar refusing to write archive contents to terminal

I think it would be nice if someone adds a link to a Windows version of dd. I am looking for a version which has all the options of the Unix dd.

[Bug-tar] 25: terminal input FAILED (iotty.at:29)

Can anybody help me? Well done on ruining the usefulness of this page guys.

tar refusing to write archive contents to terminal

Any program that operates on raw device files directly the way dd is most often used will ignore the filesystem structure; this is not dd-specific.

Compare the strace output of dd and cp sometime: When using dd on raw disks or partitions, the files that it "copies and converts" are those device files. Would bit-exact be more precise? I had the impression dd was a bitwise copy, something google supports; if one searches dd, "bit-exact" one gets more hits than dd, "byte-exact".

The question is rather what alternate would not be byte-exact? There are some advantages to using a bitstream, for instance one could stream a single byte, pipe it through a boolean operator, and perform binary arithematic, or bit mask a certain bit array.

Normally this is not done manually, but inside a program. What exactly does the output of dd mean? It means 8 whole blocks plus one partial block. Will it copy the last partial block or skip it? This wiki page is the first place with good explanation of notrunc option I found!

I am not qualified to edit the dd page, but maybe some linux guru can do it. Can someone please explain the gallows humor with the dd command and its syntax, as it is currently written in the article? Jobarts - Talk It can lead to a certain amount of disk thrashing and heart palpitations as the terminal tries to interpret the various DD examples strewn throughout the article.

Not sure wikipedia should be encouraging this usage of dd. When urandon runs out of randomness entropythe drive waits until more randomness collects in the urandom device. The write is sequential. AwesomeMachine] I think those types of examples should be removed from the article, not because the hard disk works hard, but because it just destroys all data!

What else were you expecting? If this was not clear, this is a direct quote of the Seagate documentation: This can be verified with strace. If your kernel has support for LBA48, then dd will also have support for it.

This documentation happens to be there I changed the link to it, in the article. However, Wikipedia contains much information that may not be available online. This is not a reason to delete things. It appeared that it could not backup and restore the MBR or a Vista partition.

Good chance this is not the reason but it is one possibility. I would think that we would hear more about it if others were having this problem but it may be sporadic. Backups are often not tested until it is too late.

You can find more details on my problem here.

tar refusing to write archive contents to terminal

My "original research" on this subject should probably be disregarded. Please do not remove information from reliable sources. If you have something from a self-published source a sorta-expert or something ; I wish we could post these things in the Wikipedia but it may be against WP: You could post it here instead.

Search that changelog for "LBA48". LBA48 support was present earlier; I have not found when it was added. But I suppose all that is necessary for this article is to say that Linux dd depends on the the Linux kernel.At my last job I actually got to use the real tar command, in its original meaning: "tape archive".

We had two networks that weren't allowed to be connected together for security reasons. We had two networks that weren't allowed to be connected together for security reasons. [Bug-tar] terminal input FAILED (regardbouddhiste.com), Jack Howarth.

In case this helps, if I edit the section in tests/ttyemu.c #if 0 # define DEBUG(c) fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", c) to #if 1 # define DEBUG(c) fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", c) and remake tests/ttyemu, then the following occurs.

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.

OK, I Understand.

Your Answer

tar noticed that its stdout is connected to a terminal, thus refused to clutter it with its binary output. cat has no provisions for this. Redirecting tar 's output to cat thus connects the former's stdout to something not a terminal and cat doesn't care.

shell - create tar and save it to stdout - Stack Overflow